Blood Bowl

Any non development related reviews. Sites, movies, music, ect...
Post Reply
User avatar
hallsofvallhalla
Site Admin
Posts: 12026
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:29 pm

Blood Bowl

Post by hallsofvallhalla »

Use to own the board game version years and years ago..probably 0ver 20 years ago...was a blast.

Well I seen it the xbox360 version at game stop this weekend for $10 and thought what the heck.

Turns out it is a blast to play. Especially two player. For those of you that have never heard of Blood Bowl, it is a fantasy miniatures football(american) game.
Blood Bowl is an ultra violent team sport, based on the Warhammer fantasy world. Build up your team with Orcs, Elves, Dwarfs and many other fantasy creatures before jumping into the bloodiest arenas! Blood Bowl was originally created by Jervis Johnson and Games Workshop in 1987. The board game, a parody of the Warhammer world and American Football, met with success in the 80s and the 90s. The world’s largest Tabletop Wargames company continues to sell the game's miniatures today. Also, its creator never stopped improving and enriching Blood Bowl’s game system and universe with several rule changes.

Today, Blood Bowl remains very popular around the world thanks to a large community of players and numerous dedicated fansites. As for old Blood Bowl players, they have unforgettable memories of all the passionate games they used to play. Throughout the years, the original Blood Bowl game has earned a legendary status.
I highly recommend it.

Image

Image
User avatar
Jackolantern
Posts: 10891
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:00 pm

Re: Blood Bowl

Post by Jackolantern »

Wow, I definitely have to say that it looks quite graphical for a $10 XBLA game! I may have to check it out.

Although I am curious: Does it actually play like a sports game, or like a tactical game? Or some hybrid of both?
The indelible lord of tl;dr
User avatar
hallsofvallhalla
Site Admin
Posts: 12026
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:29 pm

Re: Blood Bowl

Post by hallsofvallhalla »

it is more tactical than sporty. I am not a sports fan whatsoever, matter of fact I am very anti-football but I love this game. It does have a sports element to it though.

It is like Simfarm. Farming is not fun, but simfarming is a blast! :)



I am actually putting together a weekend blood bowl tourney, the board game version of course.

WARNING: An opinion will follow..it is only my opinion and not the opinions of this site..:) It is not meant to anger, just an opinion of a nerd.

Can't stand American football, idolizes and makes heroes out of criminals and undeserving people. Not saying that is everyone in football. Take Cam Newton from Auburn. They made one Saturday Cam Newton day and actually canceled a returning War heroes celebration for it! I live in Alabama so I have had to hear about him and his cheating and winning and all that garbage. Pro Sports players are idolized by kids. They should be held to the highest standards. You get caught dog fighting then you can never play again, get caught with drugs, never play again....period.

Plus I believe American Football is scripted. They know who will win before the start of the season. It is all a money game. No multi billion dollar franchise is left to fate...trust me..
User avatar
Jackolantern
Posts: 10891
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:00 pm

Re: Blood Bowl

Post by Jackolantern »

I understand a lot of frustration towards football. I personally cannot stand NFL. I do think that all those people are incredibly far removed from reality, they believe their own hype, and personally every time they open their mouth I can't stand anything that comes out, considering that most of them are ego-maniacs who think they are gods for throwing around a football. I hate people like Michael Vick and actually would delight in them getting a career-ending injury.

However, even with all of that opinion, I enjoy college football. The vast majority of them are playing just for a scholarship not unlike the same scholarship someone could get for academic performance in high school. Most are not going pro. They are typically not ego-maniacs unless the media starts blowing them up and they decide to buy into it themselves. That is usually what happens around the draft period and the first 2 or 3 years in the NFL when they begin to think they are gods. However, there is good reason for all the talk about Cam Newton. He is hardly-even-arguably the best quarterback in college football in the last 50 years, if not all time.

And football is definitely not scripted. There have been far too many nationwide-disappointments for it to be. If you want to see scripted football, go back and look at some XFL tapes from earlier last decade. It was owned by the owner of WWE wrestling, and it had way too many "storyline victories", fourth-quarter comebacks, etc. It was pretty obvious that while it may not have been scripted, there seemed to be things going on behind the scenes to favor a team or another. But those things don't just happen in traditional football any more than blind probability. If someone is scripting the NFL, they are doing a terrible job of it. There is also far too much money for it to be scripted. You can't forget that every team is privately owned. Superbowl wins can be worth millions upon millions to a franchise. How could you get them to go along with taking a loss when a win would be worth more money than the NFL company could pay (and they absolutely are)? Eventually some chairman would throw a tantrum and threaten to blow the whole thing open. And it really doesn't matter to the NFL who wins the season. If it is a team who hasn't won in decades or ever, it strengthens the NFL in that region, and if it is a "dynasty team" victory, it just saturates the region further, setting the seeds for young lifetime fans. Also, what about all the retired players who have no allegiance to the NFL anymore? Wouldn't we eventually get a death-bed admission to the whole thing being scripted? That is my main problem with conspiracy theories, is they don't take the pride or conscience of the thousands of involved individuals into consideration.

Sorry, but I just can't see it :P
The indelible lord of tl;dr
User avatar
hallsofvallhalla
Site Admin
Posts: 12026
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:29 pm

Re: Blood Bowl

Post by hallsofvallhalla »

you, like everyone else is looking at a much to big picture. Think small. I never said the players were involved. They don't have to be. That's why coaches are paid so much. Good directors can make actors out of anyone. it is not a whole scripted series, just various small changes to make things happen. The games are really played, but one stupid move by a coach or coordinator can throw a whole game. If it doesn't work out then they roll with it.

Things are actually opposite of what you are saying. Back when i watched football in the 80's you had the same teams going to the super bowl every year. Broncos, 49ers, cowboys, Dolphins, ect.. Things were left up to fate and the good teams won because they were good. People were getting board.

Now a team like the saints can go nowhere for years then all of sudden a almost perfect season and win the super bowl then the next year with pretty much the same team go nowhere again. New Orleans made a ton off of it. It is not the NFL that does the paying, it is the other way around. The highest paying city will win. They draw more revenue from winning a super bowl than anything.

But I do not want to kill this thread with opinions. Just my thoughts.
User avatar
Jackolantern
Posts: 10891
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:00 pm

Re: Blood Bowl

Post by Jackolantern »

hallsofvallhalla wrote:Things are actually opposite of what you are saying. Back when i watched football in the 80's you had the same teams going to the super bowl every year. Broncos, 49ers, cowboys, Dolphins, ect.. Things were left up to fate and the good teams won because they were good. People were getting board.

Now a team like the saints can go nowhere for years then all of sudden a almost perfect season and win the super bowl then the next year with pretty much the same team go nowhere again.
"Dynasty teams" were mostly killed with the introduction of the salary cap in the mid-90's. That is now why teams don't dominate the Superbowl anymore, and small teams can make it and then go back to being bad. It used to be that once a team got so big, they just kept snow-balling, making more money, paying more for players, and on and on. Now, after a Superbowl win, it is basically customary for a handful of high-end players to leave the team for more money elsewhere, because the current winner team can't actually pay to keep them. They go to smaller teams that have more money under the cap to pay out.

I guess I just don't know where it could be rigged. The only feasible argument out there is that the refs could make some bad calls to benefit a preferred team, but if that is so, why would the NFL institute video replay rules in 1999? It seems like the last thing they would want to do if they knew the refs were making crooked calls, since it stops the game and gives the TV and stadium audience about 5 different slow-motion angles. And there is no way the teams themselves are in on it. They are not the same company as the NFL, and believe it or not, they are really not even on the same team. There are different chairmen for each team that are a separate entity from NFL, and if the NFL could not pay them at least equal what a Superbowl win is worth (which they can't, considering how many mouths need to be fed on NFL's side), how are they going to make a team take a dive? Why wouldn't anything at all have come out about this by now?
The indelible lord of tl;dr
Post Reply

Return to “Misc”